IRS Encourages Taxpayers to File Soon, IR-2022-137 The IRS has reminded taxpayers still waiting to file their returns to file as soon as possible. Taxpayers can use special tools available on IRS.gov that can help them file. The online tools are avail...
IRS Issues Directions to Employees for Video Meetings with Taxpayers The IRS has issued directions for its taxpayer facing employees to hold video meetings with taxpayers and their representatives. Going forward, the IRS will continue to offer video meetings via secure...
Developing policies related to contributions will help to structure your organization to comply with IRS rules and regulations.
An important source of support for many charitable organizations is from contributions. Contributions can come in many forms and can be for many purposes. However, non-profits also have certain responsibilities when they accept contributions, some of which are described below:
Complying with donor intent – While many contributions may be intended for everyday use, organizations can also solicit or simply receive donations earmarked for a specific project or program. If donors are responding to such a direct solicitation or otherwise indicate what they intend their donation to be used for, it is important for the organization to segregate these contributions (remember, only a donor can impose an actual restriction on funds). In general, these contributions will be treated as restricted funds on the organizations books. When there is an expressed or implied intent as to how the money is to be used, the organization has a responsibility to use the money in that way. If it can’t, it may even need to give the money back (often a provision in many grants). If an organization is not sure about donor intent, it is always best to ask the donor
Non-cash contributions – Not all contributions are cash. Donors may give property, stock, equipment, or even services. Generally, for non-cash donations over $5,000 (except for donated publically traded securities), the donor must provide the organization with IRS Form 8283 and the organization must sign the form. Other more complex rules exist for when a donated item is subsequently sold and for motor vehicle donations. You should consult with a professional to understand your legal obligations before accepting these types of gifts, but should know that there are rules out there.
Acknowledgment and disclosures to donors – It is always a good idea to acknowledge the donor’s gift and in some cases, it is even required. Because individuals often use their charitable contributions as a tax deduction, the IRS established rules regarding disclosures to donors. Failing to provide donors with the proper disclosures can even cause the organization to be fined by the IRS.
One such example of this is in a quid pro quo contribution in which the donor receives goods or services in return for the contribution (for example, depending on contribution level, a donor might get a token of appreciation such as a coffee mug or a shirt). According to the IRS, written acknowledgement is always required in this case unless the gifts have an insubstantial value, which is further defined as the fair market value (FMV) of the benefit received is not more than $50 or 2% of the payment, whichever is less. Again, the guidance in this area is complex and you should always consult authoritative literature if you have a question (IRS Publication 1771 is a good source).
Documentation – We also want to point out the importance of maintaining support on contributions, especially for larger amounts! Documentation that should be kept might include a copy of the check, a copy of any letter or paperwork that came from the donor, a copy of any returned solicitation stub to which the donor is responding, and a copy of any acknowledgement letter sent. This may not be practical for organizations that receive lots of small gifts throughout the year so you may want set a minimum amount for which support will be maintained.
By understanding the issues up front and developing policies to deal with contributions, organizations can ensure that they comply with any rules.
Make sure you are filing the correct IRS form for your Exempt Organization.
The IRS has certain thresholds that dictate what type of return a charitable organization must file. Each year, it is important to make sure you are filing the correct form.
The following table provides the filing thresholds applicable to each form:
Thresholds:
Form to File:
Gross receipts normally less than $50,000.
990-N (e-Postcard)
Gross receipts less than $200,000 and total assets less than $500,000.
990-EZ
Gross receipts greater than $200,000 or total assets greater than $500,000.
990
Private foundation – regardless of financial status.
990-PF
Exempt organizations should also keep in mind the requirements under which they must file their returns electronically:The IRS defines gross receipts as the total amounts the organization received from all sources during its tax year, without subtracting any costs or expenses.
The e-file requirement exists for exempt organizations with $10 million or more of total assets that also file at least 250 returns (includes income, excise, employment tax, and information returns) in a calendar year.
Private foundations are required to file Form 990-PF electronically regardless of their asset size if they file at least 250 returns annually.
Form 990 filings are due by the 15th day of the 5th month after the organization’s accounting year ends (for example, by November 15th for a June 30th fiscal year filer). The return can be extended for two additional three month periods.
Any Non-Profit should incorporate certain basic policies into their office manual.
While it may seem like anything you do needs to be documented and it is easy to get overwhelmed with exactly what the most important policies really are, it doesn’t have to be.
In recent years, organizations have even seen the IRS inquire about policies on the Form 990. And while the IRS has no authority to require the policies, answering “no” doesn’t look good to the IRS or the public (and may even increase your chance of being audited, according to the IRS).
Following are some of the most common and important policies that any non-profit should have. This list is not intended to be all inclusive or to emphasize any policy as more important than the next.
Conflict of interest policy.
Code of ethics / behavior policy.
Whistleblower policy.
Document retention and destruction policy.
Compensation procedures.
Gift acceptance policy.
Employee / personnel handbook.
Investment and spending policy (if applicable).
No matter what size your organization is, making sure to document certain policies in writing is always a safe bet. The internet can also be a valuable resource for finding examples of policies to help you develop your own.
The IRS has updated its simplified procedure for estates requesting an extension of time to make a portability election under Code Sec. 2010(c)(5)(A). The updated procedure replaces that provided in Rev. Proc. 2017-34. If the portability election is made, a decedent’s unused exclusion amount (the deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE) amount) is available to a surviving spouse to apply to transfers made during life or at death.
The IRS has updated its simplified procedure for estates requesting an extension of time to make a portability election underCode Sec. 2010(c)(5)(A). The updated procedure replaces that provided inRev. Proc. 2017-34. If the portability election is made, a decedent’s unused exclusion amount (the deceased spousal unused exclusion (DSUE) amount) is available to a surviving spouse to apply to transfers made during life or at death. The simplified method is to be used instead of the letter ruling process. No user fee is due for submissions filed in accordance with the revenue procedure.
A simplified method to obtain an extension of time was available to decedents dying after December 31, 2010, if the estate was only required to file an estate tax return for the purpose of electing portability. However, that method was only available on or before December 31, 2014. Since December 31, 2014, the IRS has issued numerous letter rulings underReg. §301.9100-3granting extensions of time to elect portability in situations in which the estate was not required to file a return underCode Sec. 6018(a). The number of ruling requests that were received after December 31, 2014, and the related burden imposed on the IRS, prompted the continued relief for estates that have no filing requirement underCode Sec. 6018(a).Rev. Proc. 2017-34provided a simplified method to obtain an extension of time to elect portability that is available to the estates of decedents having no filing obligation underCode Sec. 6018(a)for a period the last day of which is the later of January 2, 2018, or the second anniversary of the decedent’s death. An estate seeking relief after the second anniversary of the decedent’s death could do so by requesting a letter ruling in accordance withReg. §301.9100-3.
Despite this simplified procedure, there remained a significant number of estates seeking relief through letter ruling requests in which the decedent died within five years of the date of the request. The number of these requests has placed a continuing burden on the IRS. Therefore, the updated procedure extends the period within which the estate of a decedent may make the portability election under that simplified method to on or before the fifth anniversary of the decedent’s date of death.
Section 3 provides that the simplified procedure is only available if certain criteria are met. The taxpayer must be the executor of the estate of a decedent who: (1) was survived by a spouse; (2) died after December 31, 2010; and (3) was a U.S. citizen or resident at the time of death. In addition, the estate must not be required to file an estate tax return underCode Sec. 6018(a)and did not file an estate tax return within the time prescribed byReg. §20.2010-2(a)(1)for filing a return required to elect portability. Finally, all requirements of section 4.01 of the revenue procedure must be met.
The revenue procedure does not apply to estates that filed an estate tax return within the time prescribed byReg. §20.2010-2(a)(1)to elect portability. For taxpayers that do not qualify for relief because the requirements of section 4.01 are not met, the estate can request an extension of time to file the estate tax return to make the portability election by requesting a letter ruling.
Under Section 4.01, the requirements for relief are: (1) a person permitted to make the election on behalf of a decedent must file a complete and properly-prepared Form 706,United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return,(as provided inReg. §20.2010-2(a)(7)) on or before the fifth annual anniversary of the decedent’s date of death; and (2) "FILED PURSUANT TO REV. PROC. 2022-32 TO ELECT PORTABILITY UNDER §2010(c)(5)(A)" must be written at the top of the Form 706. If the requirements of sections 3.01 and 4.01 are met, the estate will be deemed to meet the requirements for relief underReg. §301.9100-3and relief will be granted to extend the time to elect portability. If relief is granted pursuant to the revenue procedure and it is later determined that the estate was required to file a federal estate tax return, based on the value of the gross estate, plus any adjusted taxable gifts, the extension of time granted to make the portability election is deemed null and void.
If a decedent’s estate is granted relief under this revenue procedure so that the estate tax return is considered timely for electing portability, the decedent’s deceased spousal unused exclusion amount that is available to the surviving spouse or the surviving spouse’s estate for application to the transfers made by the surviving spouse on or after the decedent’s date of death. If the increase in the surviving spouse’s applicable exclusion amount attributable to the addition of the decedent’s deceased spousal unused exclusion amount as of the date of the decedent’s death result in an overpayment of gift or estate tax by the surviving spouse or his or her estate, no claim for credit or refund may be made if the limitations period for filing a claim for credit or refund with respect to that transfer has expired. A surviving spouse will be deemed to have filed a protective claim for refund or credit of tax if such a claim is filed within the time prescribed inCode Sec. 6511(a)in anticipation of a Form 706 being filed to elect portability pursuant to the revenue procedure.
The revenue procedure is effective July 8, 2022. Through the fifth anniversary of a decedent’s date of death, the procedure described in section 4.01 of this revenue procedure is the exclusive procedure for obtaining an extension of time to make portability election if the decedent and the executor meet the requirements of section 3.01 of this revenue procedure. If a letter ruling request is pending on July 8, 2022, and the estate is within the scope of the revenue procedure, the file on the ruling request will be closed and the user fee will be refunded. The estate may obtain relief as outlined in the revenue procedure by complying with section 4.01.Rev. Proc. 2017-34, I.R.B. 2017-26, 1282, is superceded.
The IRS intends to amend the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) regulations under Code Secs. 59A and 6038A to defer the applicability date of the reporting of qualified derivative payments (QDPs) until tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025.
The IRS intends to amend the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) regulations underCode Secs. 59Aand6038Ato defer the applicability date of the reporting of qualified derivative payments (QDPs) until tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025.
Background
Final BEAT regulations adopted withT.D. 9885include rules underCode Secs. 59Aand6038Aaddressing the reporting of QDPs, which are not treated as base erosion payments for BEAT purposes. The final regulations generally apply to tax years ending on or after December 17, 2018.
In general, a payment qualifies for the QDP exception if the taxpayer satisfies certain reporting requirements.Reg. §1.6038A-2(b)(7)(ix)requires a taxpayer subject to the BEAT to report onForm 8991, Tax on Base Erosion Payments of Taxpayers With Substantial Gross Receipts, the aggregate amount of QDPs for the tax year, and make a representation that all payments satisfy the reporting requirements ofReg. §1.59A-6(b)(2). If a taxpayer fails to satisfy these reporting requirements with respect to any payments, those payments are not eligible for the QDP exception and are treated as base erosion payments, unless another exception applies.
The QDP reporting rules ofReg. §1.6038A-2(b)(7)(ix)apply to tax years beginning on or after June 7, 2021. Before these rules are applicable (the transition period), a taxpayer is treated as satisfying the QDP reporting requirements to the extent that the taxpayer reports the aggregate amount of QDPs onForm 8991, Schedule A, provided that the taxpayer reports this amount in good faith (Reg. §1.59A-6(b)(2)(iv);Reg. §1.6038A-2(g)).
InNotice 2021-36, I.R.B. 2021-26, 1227, the IRS announced the intention to extend the transition period through tax years beginning before January 1, 2023, while the IRS studies the interaction of the QDP exception, the BEAT netting rule inReg. §1.59A-2(e)(3)(vi), and the QDP reporting requirements. The IRS has not yet issued regulations amending the applicability date ofReg. §1.6038A-2(g). The IRS continue to study these provisions and has determined that it is appropriate to further extend the transition period.
Deferred Applicability Date of QDP Reporting and Taxpayer Reliance
The IRS intends to amendReg. §1.6038A-2(g)to provide that the QDP reporting rules ofReg. §1.6038A-2(b)(7)(ix)will apply to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025. Until these rules apply, the transition period rules described above will continue to apply. Taxpayers may rely on this Notice before the amendments to the final regulations are issued.
John Hinman, Director, IRS Whistleblower Office highlighted the importance of whistleblower information in identifying noncompliance and reducing the tax gap in an executive column published by the IRS. Each year, the IRS receives thousands of award claims from individuals who identify taxpayers who may not be abiding by U.S. tax laws. The IRS Whistleblower Office ensures that award claims are reviewed by the appropriate IRS business unit, determines whether an award should be paid and the percentage of any award and ensures that approved awards are paid. The IRS has paid over $1.05 billion in over 2,500 awards to whistleblowers since 2007.
John Hinman, Director, IRS Whistleblower Office highlighted the importance of whistleblower information in identifying noncompliance and reducing the tax gap in anexecutive columnpublished by the IRS. Each year, the IRS receives thousands of award claims from individuals who identify taxpayers who may not be abiding by U.S. tax laws. The IRS Whistleblower Office ensures that award claims are reviewed by the appropriate IRS business unit, determines whether an award should be paid and the percentage of any award and ensures that approved awards are paid. The IRS has paid over $1.05 billion in over 2,500 awards to whistleblowers since 2007.
Further, Hinman stated that according to the IRS’s Large Business and International (LB&I) division, whistleblowers have provided invaluable insights into violations perpetuated by large corporations, wealthy individuals and their planners. Further, since the inception of the Whistleblower Office, information from whistleblowers has resulted in over 900 criminal tax cases. Hinman stated that individuals can file aForm 211, Application for Award for Original Information, to be considered for an award. Specific, credible and timely claims are most likely to be accepted for additional consideration and referred to one of IRS’s operating divisions. A subject matter expert may contact the whistleblower to ensure the IRS fully understands the information submitted. The IRS will notify whistleblowers when a case for which they provided information is referred for audit or examination.
Further, Hinman noted that the IRS takes the protection of whistleblower identity very seriously.The IRS prevents the disclosure of a whistleblower’s identity, and even the fact that they have provided information, to the maximum extent that the law allows. Additionally, whistleblowers are protected from retaliation by their employers under a law passed in 2019. Finally, Hinman noted that going forward, the Whistleblower Office team will continue to make improvements to this important program, raise awareness about the program for potential whistleblowers and look for ways to gain internal efficiencies to move cases forward as quickly as possible.
A group of Senate Democrats is calling on the IRS to extend the filing deadline for those unable to file for and receive the advanced child tax credit (CTC) due to the processing backlog of individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN) applications.
A group of Senate Democrats is calling on the IRS to extend the filing deadline for those unable to file for and receive the advanced child tax credit (CTC) due to the processing backlog of individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN) applications.
In a July 14, 2022,letterto Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig, the Senators, led by Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), called on the IRS to"allow families who applied for an ITIN or ITIN renewal prior to April 15, 2022, to file for and receive the advanced CTC if they file a return before or on October 15, 2022."
An ITIN is needed for taxpayers who do not have and are not eligible to receive a Social Security number but still have a U.S. tax filing requirement. This includes individuals who are nonresident aliens; U.S. resident aliens; dependents or spouses of U.S. citizen/resident alien; dependent or spouse of a nonresident alien visa holder; nonresident alien claiming a tax treaty benefit; or nonresident alien student, professor, or researcher filing a U.S. tax return claiming an exception.
The senators cite figures from the Treasury Inspector General of Tax Administration stating that prior to COVID-19 pandemic, it generally took between seven and 11 weeks to process an ITIN application (depending on if it was filed during tax season).
"But, as reported by TIGTA and the IRS’ own website, processing times have increased—with ITIN application processing averaging three to four months and renewal times doubling to 41 days,"the letter states.
"Given that the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act required that an ITIN had to be issued on or before the due date of the return in order to file for the CTC, many families may not have received their ITIN prior to April 15, 2022,"the letter adds, preventing access to the benefit.
The IRS has released a Fact Sheet to help taxpayers understand how and why agency representatives may contact them and how to identify them and avoid scams. Generally, the IRS sends a letter or written notice to a taxpayer in advance, but not always.
The IRS has released a Fact Sheet to help taxpayers understand how and why agency representatives may contact them and how to identify them and avoid scams. Generally, the IRS sends a letter or written notice to a taxpayer in advance, but not always. Depending on the situation, IRS employees may first call or visit with a taxpayer. Further, the IRS clarified that other than IRS Secure Access, the agency does not use text messages to discuss personal tax issues, such as those involving bills or refunds. The IRS does not initiate contact with taxpayers by email to request personal or financial information. The IRS initiates most contacts through regular mail. Taxpayers can report fraudulent emails and text messages by sending an email tophishing@irs.gov.
Further, taxpayers will generally first receive several letters from the IRS in the mail before receiving a phone call. However, the IRS may call taxpayers if they have an overdue tax bill, a delinquent or unfiled tax return or have not made an employment tax deposit. The IRS does not leave pre-recorded, urgent or threatening voice messages and will never call to demand immediate payment using a specific payment method, threaten to immediately bring in law enforcement groups, demand tax payment without giving the taxpayer an opportunity or ask for credit or debit cards over the phone.
Additionally, IRS revenue officers generally make unannounced visits to a taxpayers home or place of business to discuss taxes owed or tax returns due. However, taxpayers would have first been notified by mail of their balance due or missing return. Taxpayers should always ask for credentials or identification when visited by IRS personnel. Finally, the IRS clarified that taxpayers who have filed a petition with the U.S. Tax Court may receive a call or voicemail message from an Appeals Officer. However, the Appeals Officer will provide self-identifying information such as their name, title, badge number and contact information.
The American Institute of CPAs offered the Internal Revenue Service a series of recommendations related to proposed regulations for required minimum distributions from individual retirement accounts.
The American Institute of CPAs offered the Internal Revenue Service a series of recommendations related to proposed regulations for required minimum distributions from individual retirement accounts.
The July 1, 2022, commentletterto the agency covered two specific areas: minimum distribution requirements for designated beneficiaries when death of the employee or IRA owner occurs after the required beginning date, and the definition of employer and guidance for multiple arrangements.
Regarding the minimum distribution requirements, AICPA recommended in the letter that the agency"eliminate the requirement … mandating that a designated beneficiary who is not an eligible designated beneficiary take distribution in each of the 10 years following the death of an employee."
AICPA also recommended that"the final regulations follow the rule … requiring only that the entire interest is to be distributed no later than by the end of the tenth year following the death of the employee/IRA owner."
Regarding the definition of employer and guidance related to multiple employer agreements, AICPA recommended"defining the retirement requirement in section 401 (a)(9)-2(b)(1)(ii) as met at the plan level in reference to MEPs [multiple employer plans] and PEPs [pooled employer plans]; when an employee terminates employment with the employer after attaining age 72 and is reemployed with either the same employer or another employer sponsoring the same MEP or PEP prior to attaining their RBD of April 1 the following year."
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report on stimulus checks during the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. From April 2020 to December 2021, the federal government made direct payments to taxpayers totaling $931 billion to address pandemic-related financial stress.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report on stimulus checks during the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. From April 2020 to December 2021, the federal government made direct payments to taxpayers totaling $931 billion to address pandemic-related financial stress.
Report Findings
Some eligible taxpayers never received payments. Eligible taxpayers can still claim their payments through October 17. There were challenges for the Service and Treasury to get payments especially to nonfilers, or those who were not required to file tax returns. Taxpayers who think they may be eligible but did not receive the third economic impact payment (EIP) or child tax credit (CTC) can request an extension and file a simplified return athttps://www.childtaxcredit.gov/. Although no new EIP and advance CTC payments are underway, the Treasury and Service could learn to manage other refundable tax credits such as the earned income tax credit (EITC). Further, the IRS’s newTaxpayer Experience Officecould help improve outreach and improve taxpayer experience.
Recommendations
GAO made two recommendations. First, the Treasury and IRS could use available data to update their estimate of eligible taxpayers to better tailor and redirect their ongoing outreach and communications efforts for similar tax credits. Second, both agencies could focus on improving interagency collaboration. They could use data to assess their efforts to educate more taxpayers about refundable tax credits and eligibility requirements.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operations and Development (OECD) is delaying the implementation of Pillar One of the landmark agreement on international tax reform.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operations and Development (OECD) is delaying the implementation of Pillar One of the landmark agreement on international tax reform.
A new ProgressReporton Pillar One, which includes"a comprehensive draft of the technical model rules to implement a new taxing right that will allow market jurisdictions to tax profits from some of the largest multinational enterprises,"will be open to stakeholder comment through August 19, 2022, OECD said in a statement.
That report notes that the plan is to finalize Pillar One by mid-2023, with the more than 135 countries and jurisdictions that are a part of the agreement able to put the framework into operation in 2024.
The revisedtimeline"is designed to allow greater engagement with citizens, businesses, and parliamentary bodies which will ultimately have to ratify the agreement,"OECD said.
The Department of the Treasury welcomed the delay.
"Treasury welcomes the additional year agreed to at the OECD to allow further time for negotiations among governments and consultations with stakeholders on implementation of the Pillar One agreement, which will make the international tax system more stable and fair for businesses and workers in the United States and globally,"a spokesperson for the agency said."Tremendous progress has been made, and additional time will ensure we all get this historic agreement right."
OECD also noted that technical work under Pillar Two, which will introduce the 15 percent global minimum corporate tax rate,"is largely complete."The implementation framework is expected to be released later this year.